About Harry and Rosemary Wong...
Harry and Rosemary Wong are teachers. Harry is a native of San Francisco and taught middle school and high school science. Rosemary is a native of New Orleans and taught K-8, including working as the school media coordinator and student activity director.
Harry Wong has been awarded the Outstanding Secondary Teacher Award, the Science Teacher Achievement Recognition Award, the Outstanding Biology Teacher Award, and the Valley Forge Teacher's Medal. Rosemary was chosen as one of California's first mentor teachers and has been awarded the Silicon Valley Distinguished Woman of the Year Award.
Harry Wong is the most sought after speaker in education today. He has been called "Mr. Practicality" for his common sense, user-friendly, no-cost approach to managing a classroom for high-level student success.
More than a half-million teachers worldwide have heard his message. Because he is fully booked for two years, he has agreed to and has invited his wife to join him in doing a monthly column for Teachers.Net so that more people can hear their message.
About Their Work...
Harry and Rosemary Wong are committed to bringing quality and dignity
to the materials they produce. For this, they have formed their own publishing
company, of which Rosemary is the CEO. They have dedicated their lives
to leaving a legacy in education and making a difference in the lives
of teachers and students.
The Wongs have written The First Days of School,
the best-selling book ever in education. Over 2.4 million copies have
A third edition of The First Days of School
has been released and includes an added bonus, an Enhanced CD featuring
Harry Wong. The Enhanced CD, Never Cease to Learn,
is dedicated to those teachers who know that the more they learn, the
more effective they become.
The Wongs have also produced the video series The Effective
Teacher, winner of the Telly Award for the best educational
video of the past twenty years and awarded the 1st place Gold Award in
the International Film and Video Festival.
They have released a new set of CDs, How To Improve Student Achievement, featuring Harry Wong as he speaks at one of his many presentations. He is the most sought after speaker in education and his presentations are legendary.
When the book, video series, and CD are used together, they form the
most effective staff training tool for developing effective teachers.
Staff developers and administrators who would like to know how to implement
the aforementioned book, video series, and CD are encouraged to consult
the book, New Teacher Induction: How to Train, Support, and
Retain New Teachers. Information about these products can be found
by visiting the publisher's website at www.EffectiveTeaching.com
Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education
by Peter M. Senge (Editor), Nelda H. Cambron McCabe, Timothy Lucas, Art Kleiner, Janis Dutton, Bryan Smith
Achievement Is Very Simple (Part 1)
The concept of school is very simple.
Teachers teach and students learn. Improve the teacher and you
improve the student.
Ask any CEO of a private company what is the greatest
asset of their company and they will tell you – their people.
When school administrators were asked,
what is the greatest asset in your schools?
1. Most administrators answered: money or finances
2. Others answered, their programs
3. A few said, the children or the students
Almost no one answered that their greatest asset is their teachers.
Yet, we all know that teacher quality is the most critical
factor by which to improve student achievement or close the achievement
Teacher. It is the teacher, what the
teacher knows and can do, that is the most important factor
in improving student achievement.
Instruction. It is how the teacher
instructs, not the program, the size of the school or classroom,
or the demographics of the students that determines student
Rather than invest in the comprehensive training of teachers,
many school districts invest in programs and structural changes.
Administrators. The school year may be coming to
a close, but it’s not too late to start planning for the
next school year.
What are you planning to do this summer: buy another curriculum
program, shuffle the school size, and reorganize job descriptions?
And when you review next year’s results, will student learning
be lacking again? We know why!
Unsuccessful schools stress programs.
They spend millions of dollars adopting programs, fads of the
year, in constant pursuit of the quick fix on the white horse.
Successful schools stress practices.
They wisely invest in their teachers and administrators and
their effectiveness. They don’t teach programs;
they teach basic, traditional academic content - and they work
at improving the instructional practices of their teachers.
So, stop spending millions of dollars adopting programs, philosophies,
Student achievement has nothing to do with programs and class
or school size.
It’s the teacher – what
the teacher knows and what the teacher does in the classroom
-- that results in student learning.
That’s right. Improving student achievement is very
simple. It’s the teacher and how the teacher
When teacher instruction is effective, you will see improved
student learning. In fact, the most effective teachers produce
as much as six times the learning gains as the least effective
New Teachers Need More than a Mentor
Here’s some surprising news, but after some reflection
it does make sense.
A new teacher lowers achievement growth by
0.12-0.16 standard deviations.
Hanushek, Kain, O’Brien, & Rivkin (2005)
This is not a statement that is disrespectful of new
teachers. It’s just a fact of life that raw
rookies need training and help to become effective. New
baseball players are not inserted into a major league lineup right
after they sign a contract. Every single one of them is
sent to a minor league farm club to learn and hone their skills.
New employees in a law firm, a restaurant, or a hardware store
all start “from the bottom up” learning all the skills
of the profession and the practices of the company. In fact,
new employees all want to learn how they can fit into the company
and how they can add value to the company.
In theory, this is reasonable but it does not apply to teaching,
because new teachers are expected to take over a class on the
first day of school as all the other teachers do, and
they are expected to perform to the
same degree of proficiency as all the veteran teachers.
We know this, and it is an important but terrifying experience,
but when school starts again in about three months, many new teachers
will be, figuratively and literally, dumped into a classroom and
told to go and teach. Many of the new teachers who are hired
are not even shown to their classrooms or formally introduced
to the staff. The very person who is the most important
factor influencing student achievement begins in isolation and
continues the year in isolation.
Oh, but we give the new teacher a mentor, say many administrators.
As this article is being written, baseball season is
in full progress. Bill Carpenter, a recently retired
Connecticut elementary school principal, shares that when he graduated
from high school he was invited by the then Brooklyn Dodgers to
their spring training camp in Florida. At training camp,
he recalls, the camp was crawling with coaches. They had
coaches for pitching, batting, catching, base running, outfield
play, infield play, sliding, base stealing, taking signals, and
warming up drills, just to name a few.
There is no debating that one of baseball’s most valued
skills is batting, especially if you note the salaries of those
who can do it well. However, at a spring training camp,
they do not have every player participate exclusively in
Yet, that is exactly what many schools and school districts do,
and several states have mandated that a new teacher is given a
mentor. There is no question that a mentor is very important
to the success of a new teacher, just as good batting is important
to a baseball team’s success. But, mentoring
alone does not produce effective teachers.
All baseball teams have a comprehensive, organized spring training
program that continues during the playing season and even during
the off-season for those who want to continue their training.
They devote their time to all the components needed for a baseball
team to succeed.
It’s the same with schools:
Some schools do nothing for their new teachers.
Others just give the new teacher a mentor, and
Others provide a comprehensive, coherent, and sustained professional
The research supports the latter as most successful.
Thomas Smith and Richard Ingersoll have determined the percentage
turnover of first year teachers. Very simply
41 percent of beginning teachers will leave after one year
if they receive no induction training
27 percent of beginning teachers will leave after one year
if they receive four components of induction training, and
18 percent of beginning teachers will leave after one year
if they receive seven components of induction training.
In other words, if all a new teacher receives is a mentor,
the new teacher has nearly a 40 percent chance of not making it
through one year of teaching.
That’s a tragic loss of human capital! And the loss
is not due to incompetence on the part of the teacher. It’s
due to the school or the district doing nothing to train and support
a new teacher.
Components of a Comprehensive Induction Program
It takes four to six years to develop an effective teacher.
Knowing this, effective induction programs are:
Comprehensive: The components include
many activities and people. Coherent: The activities and people have
an organized purpose. Sustained: The program continues for many
years, striving to develop effective teachers.
The components of an induction program could include the following:
Begin with an initial four or five days of training (in classroom
management and effective teaching techniques) before school
Offer a continuum of professional development through systematic
training over a period of two or three years.
Provide study groups where new teachers can network and build
support, commitment, and leadership in a learning community.
Incorporate a strong sense of administrative support.
Integrate a mentoring component into the induction process.
Present a structure for modeling effective teaching during
in-services and mentoring.
Provide opportunities for inductees to visit demonstration
Good induction programs are very
structured and have a perfect blend of caring, accompanied
with a lot of supervision.
Mentoring Is Not Induction
The terms “induction” and “mentoring”
are often incorrectly used interchangeably to describe what happens
to a new teacher. It must be clarified that induction and
mentoring are not the same.
Induction is an organized, sustained, multiyear program structured
by a school or district, of which mentoring may be an integral
component. Induction is a group process, one that organizes
the expertise of educators within the shared values of a culture.
Mentoring is a one-on-one process, concerned with simply supporting
individual teachers, but mentoring is not a sustained process.
Most mentoring is done to help new
teachers survive, not to thrive.
We must stop trying to portray mentoring as the effective stand-alone
method for supporting and retaining teachers. Mentors are
important, but they are an isolated episode for one year or less
in a new teacher’s life. To be effective, mentors
need to be a component of the induction process.
The Difference between Mentoring and Induction
Focuses on survival
Promotes career learning and professional development
Relies on a single mentor or shares a mentor with other
Provides multiple support people and administrative support
Treats mentoring as an isolated event
part of a lifelong professional
Limited resources spent
Investment in an extensive,
comprehensive, and sustained induction program
Reacts to whatever arises
Acculturates a vision and aligns content to academic standards
Short-term, perhaps a year
Long-term, recurrent, sustained
In many school districts,
Mentoring is carried out one-on-one, in isolation, with no
coherence to any district/school curriculum, plan, goals, or
standards, nor is there any evaluation or rigorous monitoring
of the process, whereas
Good induction programs are comprehensive, last several years,
have clearly articulated goals, provide a structured and nurturing
system of professional development and support, and are rigorously
monitored and evaluated.
Mentoring can’t do it all.
It should be obvious that adequate help cannot be done by another
teacher with a full-time load who drops by when time permits or
when a problem arises. Mentors may show up after school
begins and may not have been trained, compensated, or given direction
or goals to attain. Many mentors do not consult with other
mentors and may never even visit the mentee’s classroom.
We need more than mentors
to develop effective new teachers.
Mentoring is Not the Issue
The concept of mentoring began in 1980.
You know that year as the birth of the personal computer, most
notably the IBM PC with 16 kilobytes of memory. It’s
25 years later and we shake our heads at the thought of 16 kilobytes
(KB), because today’s computers commonly come with 1 gigabytes
of memory, which in round figures is one kilobyte times 1000 times
another 1000 equals one gigabyte of memory.
In 1996, Sharon Feiman-Nemser wrote an ERIC report on her critical
study of mentoring programs and said that few studies exist that
show the context, content, and consequences of mentoring.
And in 2004, Ingersoll and Kralik stated that the current research
did not provide definitive evidence of the value of mentoring
programs in keeping new teachers from leaving the profession.
These researchers are politely saying that there is no
research to support mentoring as an effective process to use to
train and produce effective teachers that will result in student
It is now 25 years later since mentoring came on the scene and
some people are still trying to sell it like someone would try
to sell an original IBM PC today.
And when you ask these good people how the mentoring process
is done, they will tell you that the mentor and the mentee get
together when the mentee needs help and they “reflect.”
Yes, they “reflect.”
The mentor may not have been trained, may not teach at the same
grade level or academic subject and the mentoring relationship
probably has no coherence or collaboration to
any state/district/school curriculum, plan, goals, or standards.
Also, the relationship lacks any structure, is not monitored,
and has no adequate follow-up procedure.
This should explain why we lose talented new teachers
Despite what has been said, the issue is not mentoring.
The issue is when mentoring is used as an isolated event.
Mentoring can be successful if mentors are a component part of
a comprehensive induction program.
It must be understood that mentoring is only one component of
a successful induction program. Without all of the components
in place, mentoring by itself will be of little benefit to new
This is why such districts as
Prince Georges County in Maryland provides 35 hours of training
for each mentor, and Forsyth County in Georgia provides 100
hours of training for each mentor.
One purpose of this training is to align the mentoring
process with district goals that have as its main focus student
Susan Moore Johnson of the Project on the Next Generation of
Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education says, “Mentoring
is all the rage. There is some sort of deep hope on the
part of everyone that if you get the right mentor, your life will
be saved and you will be the teacher you remember. But the
truth is that mentoring pairs seldom are anything but haphazard.
They are driven by the schedule. They are often not pairs
of people who really know the subjects that the individual is
Can you imagine a baseball team that does not have spring training?
Rather, they assign every new player a mentor and the new player
is told to contact their mentor if they need help. To make
matters worse, the mentor may not even play the same position,
which is what is often done to new teachers. That is, new
teachers don’t get help from someone in their field; they
get someone from “left field.”
In the sports world and the private sector, people are trained
continually. The goal is to achieve success. For those
who achieve exceptional success, they are inducted into the Baseball
Hall of Fame, the Marines, and a law firm.
You are not mentored into the Hall of Fame, the Marines, or a
The concept of induction is used in every profession
except education. Doctors, lawyers, engineers,
and other professionals must all prove their abilities BEFORE
they are allowed to practice their professions independently.
They are not placed in professional settings and told to rely
on their mentors, which is what is commonly done in education.
For More information on Induction
New teachers learn best from systematic
The aforementioned Susan Moore Johnson at Harvard says, “Our
work suggests that schools would do better to rely less on one-to-one
mentoring and, instead, develop schoolwide structures that promote
integrated professional cultures with frequent exchange of information
and ideas across experience levels.”
And John Saphier, writing in Beyond Mentoring
says, “We need to provide a comprehensive induction program
that involves more than just mentors. Mentors alone, though
a critical part of good induction, cannot hope by themselves to
provide the range of input, feedback, and support beginning teachers
need. Well-designed induction programs include specific
roles for principals, superintendents, central office personnel,
the teachers’ union, parents, school board, and particularly
the other staff members where the beginning teacher works.”