February 2009
Vol 6 No 2

Current Issue » Cover Page Cover Story Harry & Rosemary Wong Columns Articles Features
Back Issues
Teachers.Net Gazette Vol.6 No.2 February 2009

Cover Story by Alfie Kohn
Why Self-Discipline Is Overrated: The (Troubling) Theory and Practice of Control from Within
To inquire into what underlies the idea of self-discipline is to uncover serious misconceptions about motivation and personality, controversial assumptions about human nature, and disturbing implications regarding how things are arranged in a classroom or a society.

Harry & Rosemary Wong: Effective Teaching
To Be an Effective Teacher
Simply Copy and Paste

»Do You Have a Student Teacher?Hal Portner
»Test-taking Skills Made EasySue Gruber
»Teaching Children Refusal SkillsLeah Davies
»How to Be ConsistentMarvin Marshall
»The Busy Educator's Monthly FiveMarjan Glavac
»Dear Barbara - Advice for SubsBarbara Pressman
»What Side of the Box are YOU On?Kioni Carter
»Global Travel GuruJosette Bonafino

»Teacher Study Groups: Taking the “Risk” out of “At-Risk”Bill Page
»Can Anyone Learn to Draw?Tim Newlin
»The Heart of Mathematical ThinkingLaura Candler
»Finding Free Art Materials in Your CommunityMarilyn J. Brackney
»The Downside of Good Test ScoresAlan Haskvitz
»February 2009 Writing PromptsJames Wayne
»In The Middle School (poem)James Wayne
»Using Photographs To Inspire Writing IVHank Kellner
»Teacher Performance AssessmentPanamalai R. Guruprasad
»How To Help Victims Of Bullying: Advice For Parents & EducatorsKathy Noll
»Unwilling Student Meets Unwavering Teacher Lauren Romano
»Notes from The JungleJohn Price
»Lead the Class - Teachers as Leaders John Sweeting
»Opposing Views of a Post-Racial SocietyRoland Laird
»Who Really Needs Four Years of Math and Science? Steve A. Davidson

»Apple Seeds: Inspiring QuotesBarb Stutesman
»Today Is... Daily CommemorationRon Victoria
»The Lighter Side of Teaching
»Teacher Blogs Showcase
»Carol Goodrow’s “Healthy-Ever-After” Children’s Books
»Printable Worksheets & Teaching Aids
»Memo to the New Secretary of Education and
John Stossel: American students are NOT stupid
»Lessons, Resources and Theme Activities: February 2009
»All of the Presidents in Under 2 Minutes!, Needle Sized Art, I Am a Teacher!, How It’s Made: Copy paper, and If My Nose Was Runnin’ Money
»Live on Teachers.Net: February 2009
»T-Netters Share Favorite Recipes
»Technology in the Art Classroom
»Newsdesk: Events & Opportunities for Teachers


The Teachers.Net Gazette is a collaborative project
published by the Teachers.Net community
Editor in Chief: Kathleen Alape Carpenter
Layout Editor: Mary Miehl

Cover Story by Alfie Kohn

Effective Teaching by Harry & Rosemary Wong

Contributors this month: Alfie Kohn, Sue Gruber, Kioni Carter, Marvin Marshall, , Marjan Glavac, , Hal Portner, Leah Davies, Barbara Pressman, Tim Newlin, Bill Page, James Wayne, Hank Kellner, Josette Bonafino, Marilyn J. Brackney, Barb Stutesman, Ron Victoria, Panamalai R. Guruprasad, Alan Haskvitz, Kathy Noll, Lauren Romano, John Price, John Sweeting, Laura Candler, Roland Laird, Steve A. Davidson, and YENDOR.

Submissions: click for Submission Guidelines

Advertising: contact Bob Reap

Subscribe for free home delivery

Tim Newlin
Archive | Biography | Resources | Discussion

Can Anyone Learn to Draw?
by Tim Newlin
Regular contributor to the Gazette
February 1, 2009

How many times have you heard the words, “I can’t draw!” or “Drawing is a talent you inherit!” With such words people often dismiss their own abilities and spend the rest of their lives muttering the phrase, “If only I could draw it I could explain it much better!”

The truth is that anyone can learn to draw and “drawing talent” is not something that can be inherited – it is a symphony stimulated by social or family encouragement using whatever genetic tools we choose to exercise in order to put ideas, thoughts, and feelings into a visual image. A brain that learns to observe when it is young grows visual neurons that other brains lack. This is why we have a common misconception that drawing is an inherited talent. It's true that the drawing brain is different, but the difference has been learned and the brain has developed in response to being needed in these particular ways.

When this happens at a young age, the child appears to have inherited talent. It is now known that adult brains can also grow new neurons and develop new talents, but it is slower and the process is more difficult. Adults often lose the love of learning for its own sake. Young children find learning simple tasks to be new and fascinating.

The classic understanding of “drawing” is the application of paint, ink or graphite to a surface using well trained hand-eye movements. But technology has changed this. Today, people who cannot even draw stick figures can, with the aid of technology, create beautiful images or funny cartoons with well defined characters and recognizable objects. In short, they can communicate feelings and ideas with beautiful images even though they may not be able to “draw”.

Why is this? The answer is because they can see in their minds the image they want to create – how that image is made physical for others to see is a matter of choice. Some put pen or pencil to paper, others use pixels and programs. But the end result is aiming at the same thing. The classic definition of “drawing” requires hand-eye coordination. A person has to have a liking for the feeling of putting a pen or pencil to paper and seeing lines turn into images. People who use computers to do this must be proficient with graphic programs and enjoy the digital media. But both share the ability to “see” what it is they want to create. To the untrained observer, watching either process seems almost magical.

People who create drawings, whether digital or by hand, usually are people who are visual thinkers. Most of us think in words and concepts, but recent research has shown that visual thinkers make up about 10-15% of the population. There is no either or – it is more a sliding scale. People who think in words can also think in pictures and vice versa. And awareness as well as training can improve anyone’s abilities in either direction. It all depends on desire and motivation.

Thinking in pictures is not the only genetic trait which can help people to draw. Depth perception and an understanding of size and distance, ability to distinguish colors and tones, and hand muscle coordination can all have positive influences. But any or all of these traits will go untapped unless the person has the desire to communicate visually and is motivated to do so by family, or friends, or simply the due to their frustration of not being able to express themselves with words.

The “natural born artist” is a myth. Even the best of them needed the motivation and desire as well as the training and time. And even non-visual thinkers can, with perceptual training techniques, vastly improve their visual mental skills as well as their hand-eye or digital abilities. There are no drawings or paintings or digital images in books, films or galleries that are the result of a “god-given talent”. They are all the result of a desire to communicate motivated by a need to express, and most of all, the result of training and a lot of hard work.

Submit your drawings to the new drawing site at!

Tim Newlin's latest children's book on Scribd:
Some Rooms

Tim Newlin
Creator of - Free Drawings for Classroom Use

More Gazette articles...


TIMTIM.COM is a free-use site of thousands of color and B&W cartoon-style drawings organized by more than 50 different subjects ranging from holidays, jobs, nature, animals, transportation, computers, religion, environment, health, travel, geography and more. The site is recommended by the American and Canadian Teachers Federation and use of the drawings is free for non-commercial purposes.

Visit Tim's Features by Tim Newlin at

Tim Newlin Articles on Teachers.Net...
Related Resources & Discussions on Teachers.Net...